Low Volatility and Defensive Factors
The low volatility anomaly is the finding that less volatile stocks have delivered better risk adjusted returns. Learn the evidence, explanations and its risks.
Finance theory says higher risk should bring higher expected return. Yet research has repeatedly found that stocks with low volatility or low beta have delivered returns similar to or better than high volatility stocks, with much less risk. This low volatility anomaly is one of the most puzzling patterns in finance and the basis for popular "minimum volatility" and "low beta" funds. Understanding why it might exist, and when it struggles, helps investors use it sensibly.
The evidence#
- Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972) and later Haugen and Heine (1975) found that the relationship between beta and return was much flatter than the capital asset pricing model predicted.
- Ang, Hodrick, Xing and Zhang (2006) found that stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility had very low subsequent returns.
- Frazzini and Pedersen (2014), in "Betting Against Beta", found that portfolios long low beta assets and short high beta assets (leveraged to equal risk) earned positive risk adjusted returns across many markets and asset classes.
Measuring low volatility#
| Measure | Description |
|---|---|
| Total volatility | Standard deviation of returns over a past window |
| Beta | Sensitivity to the market. See Alpha and Beta |
| Idiosyncratic volatility | Volatility not explained by market and factor moves |
| Minimum variance optimisation | Portfolios built to minimise total risk using a covariance matrix |
Why might it exist?#
| Explanation | Idea |
|---|---|
| Leverage constraints | Investors who cannot borrow buy high beta stocks to seek higher returns, overpricing them (Frazzini and Pedersen) |
| Lottery preferences | Investors overpay for volatile stocks with small chances of huge gains |
| Benchmark pressure | Managers judged against indices avoid low beta stocks that may lag in rallies |
| Overconfidence | Investors disagree more about volatile stocks, and optimists set prices. See Overconfidence |
When low volatility struggles#
- Strong rallies: low beta stocks lag when markets surge, as in 2003 or the 2020 rebound.
- Rising interest rates: low volatility portfolios often hold bond like stocks such as utilities and consumer staples, which can fall when rates rise sharply, as in 2022's early months. See Interest Rates.
- Expensive valuations: popularity can push low volatility stocks to high prices, reducing future returns. See Factor Timing, Crowding and Crashes.
- Sector concentration in a few defensive industries.
Relationship with other factors#
Low volatility overlaps with quality: stable, profitable companies tend to be less volatile. Some research finds profitability explains part of the low volatility effect. It also tends to have negative exposure to size and momentum at times. See Quality and Profitability Factors.
Implementing low volatility#
| Approach | Notes |
|---|---|
| Minimum volatility ETFs | Optimised long only portfolios |
| Low volatility ETFs | Hold the least volatile stocks |
| Betting against beta | Long low beta, short high beta, leveraged to beta neutral |
| Sector neutral versions | Reduce concentration in defensive sectors |
Frequently asked questions#
What is the low volatility anomaly?#
The finding that low volatility or low beta stocks have delivered similar or better returns than high volatility stocks with less risk, contrary to standard theory.
Why do low volatility stocks perform well?#
Possible reasons include leverage constraints, investors overpaying for lottery like volatile stocks and benchmark pressures on fund managers.
When does the low volatility factor underperform?#
During strong market rallies and periods of sharply rising interest rates, and when low volatility stocks become expensive.
Next, learn the factor that earns from yield differences in Carry Factor.
3 quick questions on this lesson. Get them all right to finish it.
Turn on JavaScript to take the quiz.
Mentioned in
- Size FactorResearch and Backtesting